Economic useful features of different genealogical bee formations of the carpathian breed

Keywords: Carpathian bee breed, interlinear crosses, varroatosis resistance, hygienic behavior, strength of bee colonies, peacefulness of bees, winter hardiness of bee families.

Abstract

Among the factors that determine the progress of mankind, a significant place belongs to selection of breeding and productive qualities of bees. Opportunities to increase productivity and the viability of bee colonies by improving their hereditary traits depends on learning of the evolution and biology of bees. In this case, it should be noted that an important role in improving the productivity of apiaries is the use of interbreed and interlinear hybrids. In view of the above, the purpose of the study was to evaluate peacefulness, varroatosis resistance, strength, winter hardiness and hygienic properties of bee families of different intra-linear crosses of the Carpathian bee population. Studies have been conducted on bees of various genealogical formations of the Carpathian breeds in private apiaries in the village Navariya and Brody town in Lviv region. For experimental studies, 6 groups of 10 bee families in each were formed: I - control group - local bees of the Carpathian population (type "Vuchkivska" - 10 bee families); ІІ - experimental group - inbred group ♀UA3-5- 9-15.112- 2018 x ♂ UA3-5- 9-15.112-2018 (♀ micropopulation "915" x ♂ micropopulation "915" – 11 bee families); ІІІ - experimental group - selection cross ♀UA3-65- 2019 х ♂ UA3-5- 9-15.112- 2018 (line "Sto" x ♂ micropopulation "915" - 10 bee families; IV - research group - selection cross ♀UA3-5- 35-2019 x ♂ UA3-5- 9-15.112-2018 (♀ Vuchkivska x ♂ micropopulation "915" - 10 bee families); V - experimental group - selection cross ♀AE99- 307 / 67- 2018 x ♂ UA3-5- 9-15.112-2018 (♀ line "Troisek 07" x ♂ micropopulation "915" – 10 bee families); VI - experimental group - selection cross ♀G. Macha ST-07 x ♂ UA3-5- 9- 15.112-2018 (♀ micropopulation of G. Macha x ♂ micropopulation "915" - 10 bee families). It is established that between bees of different intrabreed crosses of the Carpathian population there were some differences in bee lost rates, total costs feed for the winter and per 1 kg of bees. The least food for the winter was consumed by bee families of the sixth group, but per 1 kg of bees the lowest results were observed in bees of the third group. The best winter hardiness was characterized by bees obtained from combination of females and males of the micropopulation "915", and by hygienic behavior after 12 and 24 hours after brood damage - bee colonies of the second and fifth groups, respectively. By resistance to varroatosis were the best bees breeding cross ♀UA3-65- 2019 x ♂ UA3-5- 9-15.112-2018. Inbred cross micropopulation "915" bee families were the strongest before winter and the weakest - cross G. Macha bee families. Most crosses belonged to the quiet peaceful and only bee families of the local Carpathian population and cross ♀UA3-5- 35-2019 x ♂ UA3-5- 9-15.112-2018 were marked by malevolence.

References

1. Bondarchuk H. L. 2011. Stanovlennia ta rozvytok bdzhilnytstva v Ukraini: avtoref. Dys.. kand.. s.-h. nauk: 06.04.01. Kyiv, 2011. 19 s. [Formation and development of beekeeping in Ukraine]: Abstract of Ph.D. dissertation, Kyiv.
2. Brovarskyi V., Brindza V., Otchenashko V., Povoznikov M. and Adamchuk L. 2017. Kyiv: Metodyka doslidnoi spravy u bdzhilnytstvi [Methods of research in beekeeping]. Kyiv: “Vinichenko” Publishing House.
3. Haidar V. A. and Papp V. V. 2012. Varomor – nyshchivnyi udar po varoatozu bdzhil [Varomor is a devastating blow to bee varroatosis]. Ukrainskyi pasichnyk. № 2, pp. 45-46.
4. Haidar V. A., Sakhatskyi M. I. and Papp V. V. 2012. Selektsiino-pleminna robota z karpatskymy bdzholamy vnutrishnoporodnoho typu «Synevyr» [Selection and breeding work with Carpathian bees of interbreed type “Synevyr]; Naukovi dopovidi NUBiP Ukrainy. No 34, p.11. [Electronic resource]. Rezhym dostup: http://archive.nbuv.gov.ua/e-journals/nd/2012_5/12smi.pdf. 2012. № 34. 11 с.
5. Haidar V. A. 2006. Karpatska poroda bdzhil ta yii typy. [Carpathian breed of bees and its types]. Naukovyi visnyk Natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Issue 94, pp. 30-35.
6. Haidar V.A. and Pylypenko V.V. 2010. Try typy karpatskykh bdzhil vyznani yak selektsiine dosiahnennia. [Three types of Carpathian bees are recognized as a selection achievement]. Pasika. no 3, pp. 8-9.
7 Dankevych V., Dankevych Ye. And Pyvovar P. 2018. Formuvannia koniunktury svitovoho rynku medu: suchasnyi stan i perspektyvy dlia ukrainskykh eksporteriv [Forming conjuncture in the world honey market: current state and prospects for Ukrainian exporters]. Agriculturaland Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal. vol. 4., no. 2., pp. 37–54
8. Kerek S. S. 2006. Efektyvnist vykorystannia mizhtypovykh hibrydiv karpatskykh bdzhil [Efficiency of using intertype hybrids of Carpathian bees]. Naukovyi visnyk Natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu, no 4, pp. 93-100.
9. Kerek S. S. and Kerek P. M., 2017. Osoblyvosti porodnoi kharakterystyky mistsevykh bdzhil nyzynnykh raioniv Zakarpatskoi oblasti [Peculiarities of breed characteristics of native beesfrom lowland areasof transcarpathia]. Bdzhilnytstvo Ukrainy, no 2, pp. 115-128.
10. Kerek S. S. and Kerek P. M., 2018. Porodna kharakterystyka bdzhil, shcho naseliaiut raiony zakarpatskoi oblasti z horystoiu mistsevistiu [The breed characteristic of bees inhabiting areas of the trans carpathian region with mountain ousterrain]. Bdzhilnytstvo Ukrainy, no 3, pp. 49-61.
11. Kondriuk A. F. and Yakubash N. O., 2008. Otsinka zymostiikosti ta produktyvnosti ukrainskoi porody bdzhil riznoi selektsii [Estimation of winter hardiness and productivity of the Ukrainian breed of bees of different selection]. Rozvedennia i henetyka tvaryn, issue 42, pp. 108-114.
12. Lakyn H. F., 1990. Byometryia [Biometrics]. M.: Vysshaia shkola
13. Papp V. V. and Haidar V. A. 2010. Stvorennia novoho typu karpatskykh bdzhil – «Synevyr» [Creation of a new type of Carpathian bees - "Synevyr"]. Bdzhilnytstvo, no 44, pp. 92-102.
14. Papp V. V., Kerek S. S. and Keil E. I. 2015. Karpatski bdzholy typu Synevyr [Carpathian bees of Synevyr type]. Bdzhilnytstvo Ukrainy, no 1, pp. 158-165.
15. Papp V. V., Kizman-baiza A. A. and Plyska V. M., 2017. Otsinka prostykh mizhtypovykh hibrydiv karpatskykh bdzhil v pari poiednan Synevyr ta Vuchkivskoho [Assessment of simple intertypicalhybrids of carpathian bees paired combinations of Synevyr and Vuchkivskij types]. Bdzhilnytstvo Ukrainy, no 2, pp. 158-165.
16. Shamro M. O., 2006. Sposib kontroliu stanu bdzholynoi simi u vulyku pid chas zymivli: Deklaratsiinyi patent na korysnu model [The method of monitoring the condition of the bee family in the hive during the winter: Declarative patent for a utility model]. UA 15806U; MPK A01K 47/06. 2006.01.
Published
2020-12-25
How to Cite
Fedorovych , V., Petko , M., Chornyi , I., & Mazur , N. (2020). Economic useful features of different genealogical bee formations of the carpathian breed. Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. The Series: Livestock, (4(43), 76-81. https://doi.org/10.32845/bsnau.lvst.2020.4.12