DETERMINATION AND ACCOUNTING OF THE VALUE OF MUTUAL COMPENSATION OF ERRORS IN PREDICTING THE ACCURACY OF PROCESSING ON MACHINES WITH CNC

Keywords: mutual compensation of errors, assessment of dimensional accuracy, dimensional modeling, automation of dimensional analysis

Abstract

Based on the results of experimental studies, the values and coefficients of mutual compensation of errors in technological dimensions are determined. Their use makes it possible to formalize the consideration of the influence of the mutual compensation of errors in the dimensional analysis and to increase the efficiency of the predictive assessment of the accuracy of the master links – design dimensions due to a significant, more than 2 times, reduction in the predictive values of the scattering fields and their approximation to real values, as a result of which the technological processes assessment quality will be increased at the stage of their design. An example of the use of obtained results in the calculation of operational dimension chains for the predictive assessment of design dimension accuracy is shown. It has proved the importance and efficiency of taking into account the mutual compensation of technological dimension errors to improve the assessment quality and make more informed decisions about the acceptability of technological process or the need for its adjustment. While calculating the magnitudes of scattering fields of closing links by any of the methods (max-min, probabilistic), failure to take into account the mutual compensation of errors of technological dimensions leads to a significant, more than 2.3 times, overestimation of the predicted values of scattering fields of closing links relative to the actual ones. The consequence of which may be the erroneous introduction of additional processing, which in reality would be unnecessary. The use of obtained results in practice allows to improve the predictive accuracy assessment quality and can be the basis for the further creation of algorithms for the detection of such links and automation of corresponding calculations. Formalization of calculations and taking into account the mutual compensation of errors of technological dimensions, together with similar solutions for other procedures, open the way to further automation of dimensional modeling and analysis of technological processes.

References

1. Bilanenko, V. H., Prykhodko, V. P., Melnyk, O. O. (2019). Proektuvannia tekhnolohichnykh protsesiv. Chastyna 1. Obroblennia detalei-til obertannia. [Design of technological processes. Part 1. Processing of parts-bodies of rotation]
Elektronnyi resurs: navchalnyi posibnyk dlia studentiv spetsialnosti 131 «Prykladna mekhanika»– Elektronni tekstovi dani (1 fail: 12,8 Mbait) – Kyiv : KPI im. Ihoria Sikorskoho – 232s. URL: https://ela.kpi.ua/handle/123456789/27740 [in Ukrainian]
2. Bondapenko S.H.,Cherednikov O.V. y dr.(1992) Razmepnyi analyz konstruktsyi. [Dimensional analysis of structures]. Spravochnyk. K.: Tekhnyka, – 150s. [in Ukrainian]
3. Bondarenko S.H. (1993). Rozmirni rozrakhunky mekhanoskladalnoho vyrobnytstva [Dimensionals accounts of mechano-assembly production]. Kyiv. Minosvity Ukrainy, instytut systemnykh doslidzhen osvity Ukpainy. [in Ukrainian].
4. Dietrich, R., Garsaud, D. Gentillon, S., Nicolas, M.(2004).Précis de méthodes d’usinage : méthodologie, production et normalisation, [Handbook of machining methods: methodology, production and standardization] 7ème édition, Ed. NATHAN – AFNOR, 182р.[in French]
5. Drake, Paul J. Jr. (1999). Dimensioning and Tolerancing Handbook, McGraw-Hill, New York,, 704 pages.
6. Kravchenko, L. S., (2009). Razmernyi analyz pry proektyrovanyy, yzghotovlenyy y sborke [Dimensional analysis in design, manufacture and assembly]: Uchebn. posobye [dlia stud. mashynostroyt. spetsyaln.]. – Kharkov: NTU «KhPY», – 356 s. [in Ukrainian].
7. M. Kamali Nedjid, F. Vignat and F. Villeneuve (2009), Simulation of the geometrical defects of manufacturing, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 45, No. 7-8, pp. 631-648, DOI: 10.1007/s00170-009-2001-3
8. Mercier, J. (1993) “De l’étude de fabrication à l’analyse d’usinage, 2ème édition”, Edition de la Technique moderne – Pierron, Sarguemines, 294р.(in French)
9. Pacquet, G., Marche, L., (2004).Guide de la productique, [Guide to production] Ed. Delagrave, Paris, 412p. [in French]
10. Prykhodko V., Pukhovskyi Y., Danylova L., Lapkovskyi S., Sapon S.( 2022). Informatsiine zabezpechennia rozmirnoho modeliuvannia ta analizu tekhnolohichnykh protsesiv.[Information support for dimensional modeling and analysis of technological processes].Tekhnichni nauky ta tekhnolohii. № 3(29). S.77-93. [in Ukrainian]
11. Prykhodko, V.P. (2021).Rozmirne modeliuvannia ta analiz tekhnolohichnykh protsesiv: navchalnyi posibnyk dlia studentiv spetsialnosti 131 «Prykladna mekhanika» [Dimensional modeling and analysis of technological processes: study guide for students of specialty 131 “Applied mechanics”]. KPI im. I. Sikorskoho. URL: https://ela.kpi.ua/handle/123456789/38826. [in Ukrainian]
12. Rud, V.D., Herasymchuk, O.O., & Markova, T.P. (2008). Rozmirno-tochnistnyi analiz konstruktsii ta tekhnolohii [Dimensional-accuracy analysis of constructions and technologies]. Lutsk: RVV LDTU,- 344р. [in Ukrainian]
13. Swift, K G; Booker, J D (2013). Manufacturing process selection handbook, Oxford : Butterworth-Heinemann,, 512 p.
Published
2023-04-07
How to Cite
Prykhodko, V. P., Pukhovskiy, Y. S., Danylova, L. M., Lapkovskyi, S. V., & Havrushkevych, N. V. (2023). DETERMINATION AND ACCOUNTING OF THE VALUE OF MUTUAL COMPENSATION OF ERRORS IN PREDICTING THE ACCURACY OF PROCESSING ON MACHINES WITH CNC. Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. The Series: Mechanization and Automation of Production Processes, (4 (50), 78-85. https://doi.org/10.32845/msnau.2022.4.12

Most read articles by the same author(s)