EFFICIENCY OF BACILLUS SPP. PROBIOTIC MSCROORGANISMS USE FOR SANITARY TREATMENT OF SURFACES

Keywords: probiotic, Bacillus spp., insemination, meat, by-products, offal organoleptic changes

Abstract

The use of probiotics allows to reduce contamination and to extend the shelf life of products. This is relevant in the sphere of food safety for the consumer. Under laboratory conditions, the optimal composition of probiotics from 5 strains of Bacillus (Bacillus subtilis UNCSM 020, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens ALB65, Bacillus licheniformis UNCSM 033, Bacillus pumilus UNCSM 026, Bacillus subtilis var. mesentericus UNCSM 031) was experimentally selected by in vitro method. The study of microbal contamination of moisture-retaining wipes, treated with probiotics, when storing samples of meat products on them, was carried out. QMA&OAMO (mesophyll aerobic and optional-anaerobic microorganisms) of untreated meat and by-products and those treated once with probiotic by aerosol method have been compared. Artificial contamination of meat samples with pathogenic microorganisms was carried out, followed by probiotic contamination. The research was conducted to study the possible replacement of pathogenic microflora on the surface of products with useful microflora. The efficiency of treatment of work surfaces in a butcher shop with probiotic and disinfectant has been compared. Bacillus spp. reproduction and inhibiting the growth of pathogens was observed in the study of a moisture-retaining wipe treated with probiotics starting from the second day of meat storage. Probiotic treatment of the moisture-retaining wipe improved the organoleptic properties of meat products. From the second day of storage, the contamination of probiotictreated poultry meat was 11 times less than that of unprocessed products. The rate of QMA&OAMO of probiotic-treated meat decreased on the 5th day in contrast to untreated meat, where bacterial contamination increased more than 1,500 times compared to the first day. It was found that probiotic bacteria Bacillus spp. are an effective tool for combating pathogenic microorganisms Listeria spp, Salmonella spp, E. coli, Pseudomonas spp, St. aureus. They also inhibited the growth of molds and yeast in meat processing plants. Eight hours after probiotic treatment, microbial contamination of trays, equipment, boards, refrigerators was 5.2, 10.3, 18.9, 5.2 times less, respectively, compared to treatment with chlorine-containing disinfectant.

References

1. Bansal, M., Dhowlaghar, N., Nannapaneni, R., Kode, D., Chang, S., Sharma, C. S., McDaniel, C., & Kiess, A. (2021). Decreased biofilm formation by planktonic cells of Listeria monocytogenes in the presence of sodium hypochlorite. Food microbiology, 96, 103714.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2020.103714
2. Borovik, I. V., & Zazharska, N. M. (2019). Osoblyvosti laboratornoi diahnostyky Listeria spp. [Particularities of laboratory diagnostics of Listeria spp.] Theoretical and Applied Veterinary Medicine, 7(4), 236-244. doi:10.32819/2019.74041[in Ukrainian].
3. Choi, H. J., Shin, D., Shin, M., Yun, B., Kang, M., Yang, H. J., Jeong, D. Y., Kim, Y., & Oh, S. (2020). Comparative Genomic and Functional Evaluations of Bacillus subtilis Newly Isolated from Korean Traditional Fermented Foods. Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 9(12), 1805. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9121805
4. Dourou, D., Spyrelli, E. D., Doulgeraki, A. I., Argyri, A. A., Grounta, A., Nychas, G. E., Chorianopoulos, N. G., & Tassou, C. C. (2021). Microbiota of Chicken Breast and Thigh Fillets Stored under Different Refrigeration Temperatures Assessed by Next-Generation Sequencing. Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 10(4), 765. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10040765
5. Ercolini, D., Russo, F., Torrieri, E., Masi, P., & Villani, F. (2006). Changes in the spoilage-related microbiota of beef during refrigerated storage under different packaging conditions. Applied and environmental microbiology, 72(7), 4663–4671. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00468-06
6. Eshamah, H. L., Naas, H. T., Garbaj, A. M., Azwai, S. M., Gammoudi, F. T., Barbieri, I., & Eldaghayes, I. M. (2020). Extent of pathogenic and spoilage microorganisms in whole muscle meat, meat products and seafood sold in Libyan market. Open veterinary journal, 10(3), 276–288. https://doi.org/10.4314/ovj.v10i3.6
7. Fang, T., Wu, Y., Xie, Y., Sun, L., Qin, X., Liu, Y., Li, H., Dong, Q., & Wang, X. (2021). Inactivation and Subsequent Growth Kinetics of Listeria monocytogenes After Various Mild Bactericidal Treatments. Frontiers in microbiology, 12, 646735. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.646735
8. Ham, H. (2017). Distributions of Listeria spp., Bacillus spp., Enterococcus spp., Staphylococcus spp., and Coliforms Isolated from Agricultural Herb Products from the Market. Journal of Bacteriology and Virology, 47(4), 171. doi:10.4167/jbv.2017.47.4.171
9. Harada, A. M. M., & Nascimento, M. S. (2021). Efficacy of dry sanitizing methods on Listeria monocytogenes biofilms. Food Control, 124, 107897. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.107897
10. Hua, Z., Younce, F., Tang, J., Ryu, D., Rasco, B., Hanrahan, I., & Zhu, M.-J. (2021). Efficacy of saturated steam against Listeria innocua biofilm on common food-contact surfaces. Food Control, 125, 107988. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.107988
11. Jeżewska-Frąckowiak, J., Seroczyńska, K., Banaszczyk, J., Jedrzejczak, G., Żylicz-Stachula, A., & Skowron, P. M. (2018). The promises and risks of probiotic Bacillus species. Acta biochimica Polonica, 65(4), 509–519. https://doi.org/10.18388/abp.2018_2652
12. Lonczynski, T., & Cowin, L. (2021). Validation of the Applied Food Diagnostics, Inc. Molecular Environmental Monitoring Program (MEMP) Listeria Assay for Detection of Listeria Spp. in Environmental Surface Samples: AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM 052003. Journal of AOAC International, 104(5), 1355–1365. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoacint/qsab034
13. Lv, P., Song, Y., Liu, C., Yu, L., Shang, Y., Tang, H., Sun, S., & Wang, F. (2020). Application of Bacillus subtilis as a live vaccine vector: A review. The Journal of veterinary medical science, 82(11), 1693–1699. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.20-0363
14. Neveling, D. P., & Dicks, L. (2021). Probiotics: an Antibiotic Replacement Strategy for Healthy Broilers and Productive Rearing. Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 13(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-020-09640-z
15. Park, Y. H., Hamidon, F., Rajangan, C., Soh, K. P., Gan, C. Y., Lim, T. S., Abdullah, W. N., & Liong, M. T. (2016). Application of Probiotics for the Production of Safe and High-quality Poultry Meat. Korean journal for food science of animal resources, 36(5), 567–576. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2016.36.5.567
16. Petracci, M., Mudalal, S., Soglia, F., & Cavani, C. (2015). Meat quality in fast-growing broiler chickens. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 71(2), 363–374. doi:10.1017/s0043933915000367
17. Salter A. M. (2018). The effects of meat consumption on global health. Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics), 37(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.37.1.2739
18. Shmychkova, O., Borovik, I., Girenko, D., Davydenko, P., Velichenko, A. (2021). The effect of impurities on the stability of low concentrated eco-friendly solutions of NaOCl. Voprosy Khimii i Khimicheskoi Tekhnologii, (4), 142–150. doi:10.32434/0321-4095-2021-137-4-142-150
19. Stupar, J., Holøymoen, I. G., Hoel, S., Lerfall, J., Rustad, T., & Jakobsen, A. N. (2021). Diversity and Antimicrobial Activity towards Listeria spp. and Escherichia coli among Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Ready-to-Eat Seafood. Foods, 10(2), 271. doi:10.3390/foods10020271
20. Tran, T. D., Del Cid, C., Hnasko, R., Gorski, L., & McGarvey, J. A. (2020). Bacillus amyloliquefaciens ALB65 Inhibits the Growth of Listeria monocytogenes on Cantaloupe Melons. Applied and environmental microbiology, 87(1), e01926-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01926-20
21. Zazharska N. M., Borovuk I. V. (2019). Monitorynh vydiv Listeria spp. identyfikatsiia z produktsii ptakhivnytstva v Dnipropetrovskii oblasti. [Monitoring of the Listeria spp. identification from the poultry products in the Dnipropetrovsk region] Naukovyi kurator LNU veterynarnoi medytsyny ta biotekhnolohii. Seriia: Veterynarni nauky, 21 (93), 103-108. doi:10.32718/nvlvet9318 [in Ukrainian].
22. Zazharskyi V., Davydenko P., Kulishenko O., Borovik I., Brygadyrenko V., Zazharska N. (2019) Antibacterial activity of herbal infusions against Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in vitro. Magyar állatorvosok lapja, 141(11), 693–704.
23. Zazharskyi, V. V., Davydenko, P. О., Kulishenko, O. М., Borovik, I. V., Zazharska, N. M., & Brygadyrenko, V. V. (2020). Antibacterial and fungicidal activities of ethanol extracts of 38 species of plants. Biosystems Diversity, 28(3), 281–289. doi:10.15421/012037
Published
2021-11-29
How to Cite
Borovyk, I. V. (2021). EFFICIENCY OF BACILLUS SPP. PROBIOTIC MSCROORGANISMS USE FOR SANITARY TREATMENT OF SURFACES. Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. The Series: Veterinary Medicine, (3 (54), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.32845/bsnau.vet.2021.3.1