DETERMINATION OF MICROORGANISMS` SENSITIVITY ISOLATED FROM PIGLETS WITH GASTROINTESTINAL DISORDERS TO ANTIBIOTICS

Keywords: piglets, antibiotic resistance, antibiotic-resistant microflora, gastrointestinal diseases, S. vulgaris, S. choleraesuis, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae, S. epidermidis, Str. pyogenes. S. aures, Y. Enterocolitca., conditionally pathogenic bacteria

Abstract

Resistance to antibiotics – S. vulgaris, S. choleraesuis, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae, S. epidermidis, Str. pyogenes. S. aures, Y. Enterocolitca.– is one of the most serious problems in pig farming. This study aimed to determine the sensitivity to antibiotics of microorganisms that cause a number of diseases in piglets. The most important problem is diarrhea in the first days of the animals’ life. In this study, nine pathogenic strains were used – S. vulgaris, S. choleraesuis, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae, S. epidermidis, Str. pyogenes. S. aures, Y. Enterocolitca. They were selected from rectal smears of piglets with diarrhea from farms in the Sumy region. Escherichia coli isolates were highly resistant to amoxicillin (99.9%), followed by oxytetracycline (90.5%), enrofloxacin (85.2%), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (84.5%), amoxicillin: clavulanic acid (80%), colistin and gentamicin (75%), ceftriaxone and ceftiofur (62.2%), ceftazidime (30.2%), and 95.1% showed multiresistance (MR). S. Vulgaris isolates were highly resistant to amoxicillin (97.8%), followed by oxytetracycline (89.7%), enrofloxacin (83.4%), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (83.1%), amoxicillin: clavulanic acid (80,1%), colistin and gentamicin (72.5%), ceftriaxone and ceftiofur (63.5%), ceftazidime (32.1%), S. Choleraesuis isolates were highly resistant to amoxicillin (96.7%), followed by oxytetracycline (86.7%), enrofloxacin (83.1%), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (82.8%), amoxicillin: clavulanic acid (75.6%), colistin and gentamicin (71.3%), ceftriaxone and ceftiofur (62 .5%), ceftazidime (31.0%), P. Aeruginosa isolates were highly resistant to amoxicillin (95.7%), followed by oxytetracycline (85.6%), enrofloxacin (85.6%), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (84.5%), amoxicillin: clavulanic acid (80.1%), colistin and gentamicin (62.1%), ceftriaxone and ceftiofur (50.1%), ceftazidime (30.0%). K. Pneumoniae isolates were highly resistant to amoxicillin (70%), followed by oxytetracycline (62%), enrofloxacin (64%), trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole (71.1%), amoxicillin:clavulanic acid (51%), colistin and gentamicin (49%), ceftriaxone and ceftiofur (50%), ceftazidime (25.1%). S. epidermidis, Str. pyogenes. S. aures, – isolates, which were highly resistant to amoxicillin (91.2%), followed by oxytetracycline (82.2%), enrofloxacin (83.1%), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (81.0%), amoxicillin: clavulanic acid (79 .2%), colistin and gentamicin (60.2%), ceftriaxone and ceftiofur (51.1%), ceftazidime (25.0%). Y. Enterocolitca isolates were highly resistant to amoxicillin (90.1%), followed by oxytetracycline (81.9%), enrofloxacin (80.2%), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (75.0%), amoxicillin:clavulanic acid (75.0%), colistin and gentamicin (60.2%), ceftriaxone and ceftiofur (50.9%), ceftazidime (27.0%) and 97.3% showed multiresistance (MR). An important step in solving this issue is monitoring the sensitivity of microorganisms, the causative agents of bacterial piglets’ infections to antimicrobial drugs. It will help not only in choosing an effective antibacterial drug, but will also allow to do the appropriate measures to prevent the development of antibiotic resistance and manage the threats of their spread in a certain farm, region and country in general.

References

1. Aarestrup, F.M., Seyfarth, A.M., Angen, Ø (2004). Antimicrobial susceptibility of Haemophilus parasuis and Histophilus somni from pigs and cattle in Denmark. Veterinary Microbiology 101. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed143–146.
2. Boiko, O.P. (2012). Epizootolohiia ta diahnostyka psevdomonoznoi infektsii tvaryn i ptytsi [Epizootology and diagnosis of pseudomonosis infection of animals and poultry]: dys. ….kand. vet. nauk: 16.00.03. Odesa (in Ukrainian).
3. Burch DGS, Oliver Duran C and Aarestrup FM (2008). Guidelinesfor antimicrobial use in swine. In: Guardabassi L, Jensen LBand Kruse H (eds) Guide to Antimicrobial Use in Animals.Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 102–125.
4. Dawson, K.A., Langlois, B.E., Stahly, T.S., Cromwell, G.L (1984). Antibiotic resistance in anaerobic and coliform bacteria from the intestinal tract of swine fed therapeutic and subtherapeutic concentrations of chlortetracycline. J. Anim. Sci. 58(1). 123-31.
5. Fotina, T.I., Ulko, L.G., Fotin, O.V. (2015). Sostoyanie antibiotikorezistentnosti mikroorganizmov- vozbuditeley bakterialnyih bolezney molodnyaka krupnogo rogatogo skota [Elektronnyiy resurs] [Status of antibiotic resistance of microorganisms causing bacterial diseases of young cattle] Innovatsionnoe razvitie agrarnoy nauki i obrazovaniya: mirovaya praktika i sovremennyie prioritetyi : mezhdunar. nauchn.-prakt. konf., posvyaschennaya ob’yavlennomu v Azerbaydzhane v 2015. «Godu selskogo hozyaystva», (g. Gyandzha,23-24 oktyabrya 2015): mezhdunar. nauchn.-prakt. sbornik. Gyandzha: Azerbaydzhanskiy gosudarstvennyiy agrarnyiy universitet. 398-403 (in Russian).
6. Guevarra, R. B., Lee, J. H., Lee, S. H., Seok, M. J., Kim, D. W., Kang, B. N., Johnson, T. J., Isaacson, R. E., & Kim, H. B. (2019). Piglet gut microbial shifts early in life: causes and effects. Journal of animal science and biotechnology. 10. 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-018-0308-3.
7. He, Y., Yang, X.G., Xia, J., Zhao, L.Y., Yang, Y.X. (2016) Consumption of meat and dairy products in China: a review. Proc Nutri Society. 75:385–91. 10.1017/S0029665116000641 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar].
8. Jensen, V.F, Jacobsen, E., Bager, F. (2004). Veterinary antimicrobial-usage statistics based on standardized measures of dosage. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 64: 201-215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
9. McClane, B.A., Uzal, F.A., Miyakawa, M.F., Lyerly, D., Wilkins, T.D. (2006).The enterotoxic clostridia.. In Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenburg E, Schleifer H, Stackebrandt E (ed), The prokaryotes: a handbook on the biology of bacteria, 3rd ed. Springer. New York: NY. 688-752.
10. Rood, J.I. (2006). Clostridium perfringens and histotoxic disease. In Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenburg E, Schleifer H, Stackebrandt E (ed), The prokaryotes: a handbook on the biology of bacteria, 3rd ed. Springer. New York: NY. 753-770.
11. Shkromada, O.I., Dudchenko, Yu., Udovenko, Ya. (2015). Vplyv probiotykiv na mikrobiotsenoz shlunkovo-kyshkovoho traktu teliat [Effect of probiotics on the microbiocenosis of the gastrointestinal tract of calves]. Visnyk Sumskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Seriia: Veterynarna medytsyna. 1 (48). 3-8. https://doi.org/10.32845/bsnau.vet.2020.1.1 (in Ukrainian).
12. Shkromada, O. I., Ulko L. H. (2015). Aminokyslotnyi sklad ta biolohichna tsinnist miasa svynei za vykorystannia zaproponovanoho kompleksu dezinfikuiuchykh zasobiv [Amino acid composition and biological value of pig meat using the proposed complex of disinfectants] Visnyk Sumskoho NAU. 1 (36). 143-145 (Seriia: Veterynarna medytsyna) (in Ukrainian).
13. Toxin Plasmids of Clostridium perfringens Jihong Li, a Vicki Adams, b Trudi L. Bannam, b Kazuaki Miyamoto, c Jorge P. Garcia, d Francisco A. Uzal, d Julian I. Rood, b Bruce A. McClane; http://mmbr.asm.org/content/77/2/208.full.pdf.
14. Ulko, L.H. (2018). Vplyv virusu transmisyvnoho hastroeneterytu na formuvannia imunitetu porosiat [Influence of transmissible gastroenteritis virus on the formation of piglets immunity] Naukovo-praktychnyi zhurnal Kharkivskoi ZVA. Seriia «Veterynariiai nauky». 1. 34-37 (in Ukrainian).
15. Ulko, L.H. (2015). Detoksykatsiina terapiia za hostrykh shlunkovo-kyshkovykh rozladiv u teliat [Detoxification therapy for acute gastrointestinal disorders in calves] Naukovyi visnyk Lvivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu veterynarnoi medytsyny ta biotekhnolohii im. S.Z. Gzhytskoho. Lviv. T. 17. 1 (61). ‒ Ch. 2. 322-327 (in Ukrainian).
16. Ulko, L.H. (2015). Profilaktyka khvorob molodniaku velykoi rohatoi khudoby [Prevention of diseases of young cattle] Visnyk Sumskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Seriia «Veterynarna medytsyna». Sumy: Sumskyi NAU. 7 (37). 213-217 (in Ukrainian).
17. Ulko, L.H., Nechyporenko, O.Iu. (2018). Etiolohiia hostrykh shlunkovo-kyshkovykh rozladiv u teliat [Etiology of acute gastrointestinal disorders in calves]. Materialy naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii vykladachiv, aspirantiv ta studentiv Sumskoho NAU (17-20 kvitnia 2018 r.). Sumy. 359 (in Ukrainian).
18. Ulko, L.H., Stetskova L.V. (2015). Hostri shlunkovo-kyshkovi zakhvoriuvannia u porosiat ta yikh likuvannia [Acute gastrointestinal diseases in piglets and their treatment]. Materialy naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii vykladachiv, aspirantiv ta studentiv Sumskoho NAU (20-24 kvitnia 2015). V 3 t./T.II. Sumy. 78 (in Ukrainian).
19. Ulko, L.H., Fotina, T.I. (2015). Perspektyvy zastosuvannia probiotykiv u veterynarnii medytsyni [Prospects for the use of probiotics in veterinary medicine] Multyprobiotyky v profilaktytsi ta likuvanni naibilsh poshyrenykh zakhvoriuvan: materialy mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii , m. Kyiv, 4-6 veresnia 2015. 45 (in Ukrainian).
20. Vashchyk, Ye.V. (2012). Psevdomonoz ptytsi: osnovni zakonomirnosti infektsiinoho protsesu ta udoskonalennia zakhodiv z profilaktyky khvoroby [Pseudomonosis of poultry: the main patterns of the infectious process and improvement of disease prevention measures]: dys. .kand. vet. nauk: 16.00.03. Odesa (in Ukrainian).
21. World Health Organization. Global action plan on antimicrobial resistance; 2015. p.28.ISBN9789241509763http://www.wpro.who.int/entity/drug_resistance/resources/global_action_plan_eng.pdf
22. Zhang, B., Ku, X., Yu, X., Sun, Q., Wu, H., Chen, F. et al (2019). Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibilities of bacterial pathogens in Chinese pig farms from 2013 to 2017. Sci Rep. 2019. 9(1):9908.
Published
2023-02-17
How to Cite
Bakun, Y. Y. (2023). DETERMINATION OF MICROORGANISMS` SENSITIVITY ISOLATED FROM PIGLETS WITH GASTROINTESTINAL DISORDERS TO ANTIBIOTICS. Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. The Series: Veterinary Medicine, (3(58), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.32845/bsnau.vet.2022.3.1